Contact Us
         

CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS AND ARCHIVED INFORMATION
 
As a service to our clients and the industry, we post information that we feel is of value to carriers, self-insured employers and third-party administrators.
 
Please bookmark this site for easy access to the latest information regarding current case law, legal and financial implications of the MSP laws and Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) updates.
 
Current Developments:
CMS’ April 3, 2009 Memo Regarding Use of Average Wholesale Price To Calculate Prescription Medication Portion of Medicare Set-Aside
April 3, 2009 CMS Memorandum
 
CMS Clarifies Pricing Methodology for Implantable Devices, Ability to Release MSA Funds, and Proper Use of Rated Ages 
 
CMS Clarifies Use of Life Expectancy Tables for Medicare Set-Aside Proposals
 
CMS Revises Theshold Limits for Current Medicare Beneficiaries to $25,000.
 
Current Medicare Interest Rate 11.00%
Effective April 16, 2009, the interest rate for-overpayments and underpayments will be 11.00 percent. Medicare Regulation 42 CFR §405.378 provides for the assessment of interest at the higher of the current value of funds rate (three percent for calendar year 2009) or the private consumer rate as fixed by the Department of the Treasury. The Department of the Treasury has notified the Department of Health and Human Services that the private consumer rate has been changed to 11.00 percent.
 
Case Law Regarding Medicare Secondary Payer Issues:
 
United States of America, ex rel, Elizabeth Drescher v. Highmark, Inc., 305 F. Supp. 2d 451(E.D. Pa. 2004) A Pennsylvania district court denied Highmark’s motion to dismiss them from the False Claims Act (FCA) action in which Highmark, which acted both in a private capacity as a medical insurer and in a public capacity as a Medicare contractor, allegedly violated the FCA in both capacities by shifting primary payment responsibility from itself to the Government. The court found causation was potentially the most problematic element of the FCA claim against the defendant as a private insurer, but ruled that the claim could go forward.
 
Telecare Corp. v. Leavitt, No. 04-1389 (Fed. Cir. May 25, 2005). (Telecare Corporation v. Leavitt, U.S., No. 05-263, petition denied 1/9/06).    Employer held liable to Medicare for treatment received by employee who obtained medical treatment from Medicare instead of the employer's group health carrier.
 
The Supreme Court denied review of the case for a class action asking whether an employer with no financial responsibility for the medical bills of its employees must reimburse Medicare under the secondary payer program.
 
United States ex rel. Morton v. A Plus Benefits, 10th Cir., No. 04-4148, unpublished 7/19/05. Insured brought a False Claims Act (FCA) claim against its insurer for denying coverage of certain treatment which was ultimately provided by the federal government.  Insured alleged that denying coverage shifted liability for the treatment to the federal government and resulted in a false claim being submitted to the federal government.  Since the carrier had a legitimate reason to deny coverage, the FCA claim was dismissed.  The court, however, left open the door as to whether a FCA claim can be brought if the carrier's denial to pay the claim is not based upon legitimate reasons.  
 
 
Newsletters and reports with the latest legal and financial implications of Medicare laws and regulations:
 
 
January 2008 MSP Solutions Newsletter
 
 
 
 
 
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Memorandums:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 30, 2005 CMS Memorandum (Prescription Medication Memo)
 
April 25, 2006 CMS Memorandum (Revision of Threshold Limits for Medicare Beneficiaries)
 
July 24, 2006 CMS Memorandum (Update Regarding Calculating Prescription Medication Costs)
 
May 20, 2008 CMS Memorandum (Life Table Clarification Memo)
 
Miscellaneous Items: